Mrs Grainger's Gift - Epilogue
By Ritchie Moore
Send your feedback to puericil@hotmail.com
(I'll forward it to
the
author)
Copyright 2018 by
Ritchie Moore,
all rights reserved
*
* * * *
This work is intended
for
ADULTS ONLY. It may contain depictions of
sexual activity
involving minors. If you are not of a legal age in your locality to
view such material or
if such material does not appeal to you, do not read further, and do
not save this
story.
* * * * *
Mrs
Grainger’s Gift
Some
thoughts
4th December 2017
The
characters have their own stability, in that they come on stage with a form and
psychology that already exists. During the course of the months that follow, we
see how events shape them – some a very little, some quite a lot. The youngest,
for instance, do change, or grow, in various ways. Rachael falls under the
charm of Matthew, and her attraction grows till she allows him – manoeuvres him
– into copulation. He is seduced by her, but by then he has grown into
acceptance of the situation, acceptance of his sexuality. Catherine begins as a
shy innocent girl who was shocked by the coarseness of the orphanage, but ends
as a knowing sophisticate (or near enough) who can say What the fuck quite easily. Her lover began with a mild Damn, and ended similarly talking about
sex in various positions with an adult vocabulary. They are both well-read, in
different directions – she also is into music, which he doesn’t know about, while
he knows something of history. They become educated in sexual matters as well
as vocabulary, he particularly being instructed in technique by the
women/girls/boys he has sex with (and it’s mostly initiated by them; he is
willing to participate, but has to be persuaded), and he gets a good
apprenticeship in erotic and pornographic literature. They both become informed
about erotic art and films, and through all this they try to preserve their
innocent reticence – but can’t help responding to the humiliations with
blushing mortification, reluctant emission of vaginal moisture and erections,
leading inevitably to pleasurable but oh so shaming climax, ejaculation and
all.
Bryden is
seen first as a doddering drunkard, but he isn’t really like that. He shows
himself as a sensitive man who is pretty well read and enjoys music, who has
had a love in his youth and so is sympathetic to the lovers, as well as to the
other lovers who are homosexual like him. Mr Whiston is another who becomes
more acceptable [I like to think] as we see more of him. At the dinner he is as
bawdy as the rest but seems to speak the voice of moderation, and we see him on
the ferry being very human to the young people. Mrs G however keeps her first cold
face till near her end; she enjoys hurting people, for no other reason than
that she can – like her pupil Abigail in that – but only relents once she is
brought to confront her true self by the pleading of Jeremy, and that followed
by knowledge of her approaching death.
Others are
consistent in their character – Jeremy for instance is hypnotised into helping
Lydia torment Catherine – which is a pivotal moment in the plot – but basically
he is a decent boy who can’t accept what happened. Nicholas is a shy timid boy
who has been brutalised by the school, and only comes out of his shell at the
last. What happens to him after the book ends is probably a burgeoning of his
talent and acquisition of real friends.
After the Finis, I hope I’ve shown some of the
fallout from the events. Matthew and Catherine use their money (augmented,
obviously, over time by investments and so forth, sale of the erotica library
for a very sizeable sum, etc.) in the furtherance of good causes, rescuing Tim,
the thirteen-year-old naked slave of the Malverns, as well as Ellen, and
setting them up as kindly-treated servants to the other Ravens; and also
settling the hash of Bradley, whose fall is engineered very easily. Begby has
already gone to gaol.
There is no
hint on the horizon of anything terrible to come; but we all know the market
will crash in ’29, and Hitler will come to power. We can only hope the lovers
and their household will survive all these upsets, they’ll come to a ripe old
age, both of them, and look back on a life that tried to make good some of the
hopes of humanity. Ironically, of course, as often happens, the loathsome
characters could turn out surprisingly – for instance Andrew might prove
himself as a brave hero of sorts during the coming war.
There are
several influences on the story. I suppose the image of the rich woman
tormenting a boy is from the Jane Marwood stories about Richard. I thought that
that particular scenario was a bit limiting, so gave her an academy to be in
control of – more girls to gawk of course. This was copied then when we came to
his counterpart – they were supposed to have similar experiences, but I hoped
to show a different perspective. Other stories have a difficulty with
plausibility sometimes in that the put-upon victims can easily escape in one
way or another [why not rebel, etc., what are the police doing, does the school
board know], but JM’s Richard is caught trespassing and will be punished by
police or the orphanage [whence Catherine’s problem], so he has to submit; while
I made it quite serious because while Catherine will be thrashed and degraded,
Matthew’s family are at real risk. That was the way things were in 1925 with
the so-called upper classes. I chose that year as a safe mid-time between the
wars, when things were looking up for a lot of folks, and when we get to France
there’s those wonderful expatriates all over Paris. That conversation in the
café tries to sound authentic – the ideas expressed by Hemingway are really his
at the time, and his first novel, then called Fiesta, was unfinished – though I admit his presence there at that
particular date is invented. As is that of the Rev. Summers, famous expert on
witches and vampires and naughty plays, and also a closeted homosexual, it
seems.
The conversations
of various folks also try to be plausible, in that they reflect occurrences and
books and music and films of the time, as well as ideas and opinions that were
around, even [or especially] ones not looked on as pc/acceptable these days. The
language, or style, also tries to be authentic in that it avoids terms now in
use that only existed, or were current, after 1925. The hormones, for instance,
that trigger adolescent emotions and sexuality, were unknown to most; the
“come” that means ejaculate wasn’t spelled “cum” till a few decades ago [and
even now it’s a rather offensive low Americanism to me that looks and is
illiterate]; and “gay” back then meant joyful, and I wish it still did. The
spectre of Aids, of course, was still all in the future.
Which
reminds me that I had to be careful about keeping the idiom very British, with
spellings (traveller, gaol, honour, centre) and vocabulary (lorry, sixpence
[and other coinage], knickers). “Okay” had made it across the Atlantic but not
completely; and “kid” was still a slang word not much used.
As to
possible anomalies and difficulties in the plot: it may be remarked that for
all the fucking that goes on no-one gets pregnant except the anecdotal girl at
an old dinner. This is unlikely but not impossible. There is also the
possibility of our hero catching a social disease; though the girls he has sex
with are mostly above working class, and certainly no prostitutes.
Most of the
books and literature quoted are real, and can be researched on the Internet.
Some are inventions of the author, such as the little verses of Maurice and the
epic fragment in the library, besides the translation of Under der Linden. I hope indeed that readers will find out more
about all the things mentioned.
One more
point: I have deliberately included events and conversations that have little
or no erotic content, because that’s the way life is for most of us, i.e. it
isn’t an unending series of non-stop ill-treatment and sexual shenanigans
[thank goodness], as happens in a lot of this literature, and that aspect makes
it fantastic. I try to be a bit more realistic., and hope this sandwiching the
humiliations between moments of carefree normality gives more strength to those
humiliations when they happen.
RM December
2017
(End of File)