It's
Not Fair 17
By Cassie
puericil@hotmail.com
Copyright 2014 by Cassie, all rights reserved
* * * * *
This story is intended for ADULTS ONLY. It contains explicit depictions
of sexual activity
involving minors. If you are not of a legal age in your locality to
view such material or
if such material does not appeal to you, do not read further, and do
not save this
story.
* * * * *
This story is set in
the Puericil
Universe.
See chapter 1 for an
explanation
about this series. This is another selection of letters from the "It’s
Not Fair!" letter
column, in "Boy Stuff" magazine. In them, boys complain about
how little privacy they are allowed, and about the double standard that
makes
it OK for people to see them naked but protects girls’ modesty. The
intention
of this article is illustrating the attitude changes that the
Conservative
Resurgence has brought about: children, particularly male children, are
firmly
controlled by adult authority figures, who often make a point of
emphasizing
that control, in order to keep boys in their place and out of trouble.
Please feel free to
contribute any
similar
letters if you wish to, and I’ll be happy to write the magazine’s
response and the psychologist's comments. Thanks to the contributors
for this issue!
* * * * *
* * * * *
Letter
published in the It’s Not
Fair section of the magazine called Boy Stuff:
(this letter has been written
by Namb. The magazine response and psychologist's comments are Cassie's)
Gale
(15
years old):
Dear
It's Not Fair,
I’m
a 15-year-old boy. My mom started me on Puericil
when
I was 12 years old. Back then I had two friends named Jake and Steven.
We used
to do everything together, but as we grew up … well, that’s the
problem. They
grew up and I didn’t. They got taller, but I didn’t. Their penises got
bigger
but mine didn’t. They grew hair down there, but I didn’t. Their voices
changed,
but mine didn’t. We all worked out together, but whereas they got big,
strong muscles
I didn’t. Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not a 97-pound weakling. I may be
small,
but my body is tight. I have the figure of a 12-year-old athletic girl.
However,
after a couple of years Jake and Steven didn’t want to hang out with
me. They
said I was too “little boy” for them and was cramping their style with
girls
they met. They were right. When we played sports, it wasn’t only my
size that
kept me from doing as well as they did, it was something else. I lost
my edge.
Instead of diving for the ball to make a catch, I’d actually flinch
away if it
came at me too fast. Even the little kids made fun of me. Eventually I
had to
give up playing ball altogether.
This
leads me to my current situation. I have no friends and I don’t have
many
activities to do. My mom noticed this and she decided that since I
couldn’t get
along with boys anymore, maybe I should try to get along with girls.
She made
arrangements with my Aunt Kay and my Cousin Amy for a couple of hours
of “Girl
Time” every week.
Girl
Time means I go over my aunt’s house where my cousin dresses me like a
girl and
makes me play with her dolls and play other girl games. My mother and
my aunt
bought me a whole wardrobe of girl’s clothes and Amy has a fun time
dressing me
up. Amy even gave me a girl’s name like I was one of her dolls. She
calls me
Abigail and I have to answer to it.
It’s
not fair! Amy is only 9 years old. She’s 6 years younger than me, yet
she
treats me like a younger sister. Most of the time, Girl Time is OK. I
don’t like
Girl Time when Amy gives me a bath or dresses me in frilly underwear
and gets
to see my “boy parts.”
I
hate it when Amy orders me around, but if I don’t listen to her, I
don’t get to
play. Mom and my aunt threatened to let Amy spank me if I didn’t obey
her, but
it has never come to that. Not that I’m afraid of Amy, I just have this
urge to
do what she tells me to do even though I don’t like it. I wouldn’t let
a boy
order me around like that. I think it has something to do with her
being a
“real girl.”
Next
week is Amy’s birthday. She’s going to have some of her friends over
for a
party. I don’t know what to do. I actually like the idea of getting
into a
pretty dress and having my hair done and my aunt even says she’ll do my
makeup.
I’ll put up with a bath and getting dressed by Amy if it that’s what it
takes
to look pretty for the party. However, I’m afraid to meet new girls.
What will
they think of me? How should I act towards them?
The
magazine’s
response:
Dear Gale,
We are sorry about your
drifting away from your old friends. That happens sometimes. However,
you can
make new friends. Even if it doesn’t seem like it, there are more boys
your age
who take Puericil. Maybe your mom will want to get in touch with other
families
in your area with boys on Puericil and set play dates for you.
There’s nothing wrong
with not being good at sport or not having a girlfriend yet. You’ll
have time
for girlfriends in the future. Childhood is a fun part of life: Do not
be in a
hurry to grow up!
Remember that your mom
only wants the best for you. She loves you and has more experience, so
you
should trust her judgment. She probably doesn’t want you to get in all
the
trouble other boys your age get into.
It’s cool that your “Girl
Time” allows you to get along with girls, and that you get to spend
time with
your cousin. It seems you enjoy playing with her, so you shouldn’t
really worry
that Amy gets to see your “boy parts” when she dresses you or gives you
a bath.
It’s just part of the game, and you are probably not the first young
boy she
sees naked anyway.
Do not be afraid to meet
new girls. If Amy is nice then her friends will probably be nice too.
Having
more people to play with you is better. Just act like you do when it’s
just Amy.
I’m sure the girls will
like you.
Cheer up, Gale!
Additional
(not
published) comments from the author of the magazine’s response, a
female
psychologist who specializes in boys’ emotional development:
This
is an older letter. Gale, or perhaps I should call him Abigail, was put
on
Puericil before it became so prevalent. Boys like him had it rough,
since most
or all of his peers were not on the drug. That glaring difference adds
even
more much-needed humbling to the male ego, but it’s unfair to deprive
other
boys of the advantages of Puericil. Nowadays most boys take Puericil,
but the job
is not finished: We should strive for a 100% rate of teenage boys on
Puericil.
It
is very suitable for the psychological development of a teenage boy to
be
reduced to the status of plaything for a 9-year-old girl. He can’t very
well
get any misogynistic thoughts, like most males his age used to have in
the
past, when he is being undressed, bathed and dressed in frilly panties
by a
much younger girl. And yet it seems he has come to like it. Just
imagine what
conflicted thoughts must go through his head when he is naked in front
of
little Amy and she is sliding some sissy panties up his legs, while his
hairless penis waves right in front of her face.
I
feel Amy is very fortunate to have a playmate like his older cousin.
Apart from
having fun treating him like a live doll, it teaches her about feminine
leadership
and superiority.
When
talking with Gale’s mom to get permission to publish his letter, I
suggested
that Amy should start a photo collection of Gale wearing his girlish
clothes and
makeup. I’m happy to report that my suggestion was followed, and his
mom emailed
me some of those pictures. Gale/Abigail looks really cute with his hair
done
like a girl, his makeup and wearing only frilly pink panties.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Letter
published in the It’s Not
Fair section of the magazine called Boy Stuff:
(this letter has been written
by Steve, based on an idea by Mark. The magazine response and
psychologist's comments are Cassie's)
Terry
(17
years old):
I
think the whole world is going crazy. It seems that everyone is intent
on
making sure that we boys have hardly any privacy at all!
I
am a junior in high school, and we just went back to school after 10
days off
for spring break. We were told that there was going to be some
construction to
the P.E. locker rooms during spring break to comply with some new law
called
the conservative resurgence. We didn't think much about it during the
break,
but we sure as heck noticed a difference when we got back.
The
girl and boy locker rooms have always been next to each other in a
corridor
behind the gymnasium, and the entrances were clearly marked. When we
got back
from spring break, however, the door to the girls locker room had
disappeared,
and there was nothing but a solid wall there. On what used to be the
entry door
to the boys locker room, however, was a new sign that said simply "To
Locker Rooms." Again, no big deal, right? We thought they had just put
in
a new corridor with the entry to the boys locker room on one side and
the entry
to the girls locker room on the other side. Boy, were we wrong. This
door led
right into what had always been the boys locker room. There used to be
a privacy
wall just inside the door, but that wall was now gone, so anyone could
see into
the room whenever the door was pulled open. Anyone walking down the
corridor
could see perfectly in between the rows of lockers where we boys
change. Continuing
down to the end of the corridor, there were now a door on the left that
led to
the boys toilets, and a new entry to the boys showers, which was now
wide open.
Our showers are in a long row on the left wall, with hooks for towels
on the
right wall. It is just one wide open space, with no walls or partitions
between
the showers, but we boys never cared before. Now, however, we cared
very much,
because what was at the back wall of the showers? The entry to the
girls locker
room, with a big sign saying "Girls Locker Room. Girls Only" Are you
kidding me? Of course, when that door was pulled open, there was a wide
privacy
wall, so no matter where we boys stood in the showers, we could not see
anything. That's right. Now, every girl going to P.E. gets to walk
right
through our locker room, and can see us changing into our gym clothes
before
P.E., but the worst thing is the end of P.E. We are required to shower
after
P.E. before putting our school clothes back on, and the coaches
supervise to
make sure we do so, so the girls going back to their locker room after
P.E.
walk right past all of us naked boys in the shower, and of course they
can see
everything. It's ridiculous! They can see our fannies, they can see our
peenies, and of course, if our peenies happen to be stiff, they can see
that
too.
We
just have to take the grins, giggles, and cute comments like "Hi,
Terry,
so nice to see you… all of you!" Ha Ha Ha.
Also,
we have physical punishment in our high school, only for boys of
course, so if
any of us has gotten swats from the paddle and have a red fanny, the
girls of
course notice that too, and there's always cute comments about the bad
boy with
the red fanny. The girls have told us that they also think it's funny
that we
have no privacy or separation in the showers, because in the girls
showers,
which are right behind the wall with our shower nozzles, there are
walls
between each shower and a shower curtain they can close. Why is it that
girls
are entitled to all of that privacy, and we boys are entitled to no
privacy at
all? It's Not Fair!
The
magazine’s
response:
Dear
Terry,
You
are certainly right that people nowadays are becoming less worried
about boys’
privacy or modesty. Actually, many people have come to believe, based
on recent
psychological research, that in fact excessive modesty in a boy is not
healthy,
hence the popular phrase boys hate: “little boys should not be so
modest!”
We
believe that the new arrangements in your high schools have to do with
that. We
are very sorry about it; it must be really embarrassing to have the
girls march
through your locker room and see everything!
Still,
those things happen. We suppose parents and school authorities have
made the
decision, so there is nothing you can do about it. It’s best to get
used to it
and try not to let it embarrass you too much. If you make a fuss you’ll
only
get in trouble and have the girls see you with a red bottom more often.
It’s
no use getting worked up over something that is not yours to control,
and at
least you can take comfort from the fact that there are many other boys
in
similar situations, as you can see in these letters. If you don’t react
to
teasing, the girls will tire of that and get used to it too!
Additional
(not
published) comments from the author of the magazine’s response, a
female
psychologist who specializes in boys’ emotional development:
I
have to congratulate the school authorities for coming up with this clever
arrangement. It’s easy to imagine the boys’ dismay and indignation, and their
helplessness to do anything about it. Most of them are probably on Puericil,
with little will to resist authority figures, and the rest are probably quite
docile too, since any sign of rebellion is easily treated nowadays.
Notice
how emphatic Terry is about how, no matter where the boys stand in the showers,
they can not see anything. Boys being boys, it is a certainty that they have
tried their best, looking from all possible angles. Very naughty of them!
Still, one can hardly begrudge them, considering how awfully embarrassed they
must be to have the girls walk next to them, shouting teasing remarks at the naked
boys. They can’t escape from it, since after going out of their way like this
to fight boyish “false modesty” I’m convinced that the teachers make sure no
boy skips his shower, and that they are on display when the girls go through
the locker room.
That
experience, repeated so often, is an excellent way of putting boys in their
place!
(The End)